Lying

Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 05.30.17

* Harvard law students go all out in everything they do -- and lying is no exception. [New Yorker] * If you're looking to purchase ancillary legal services (e.g., business or litigation support), check out the Buying Legal Guide, just launched today by the Buying Legal Council and Legal.io. [Buying Legal Guide] * Joshua Matz explains how and when the Supreme Court might review the Trump travel ban (aka "Muslim ban"). [Take Care via How Appealing] * Speaking of the courts, here's Professor Carl Tobias's advice to President Donald Trump on how to fill those 100+ vacancies in the federal judiciary. [Washington and Lee Law Review Online] * Why is flying such a miserable experience? Blame not just the lawyers but also the index funds, as Matt Levine explains. [Bloomberg View] * A prominent professor sues Columbia Law School, alleging age discrimination. [TaxProf Blog] * Professor Eugene Volokh explains the First Amendment to government officials: "no, the government may not deny permits for speech because it views the speech as promoting 'bigotry or hatred.'" [Volokh Conspiracy / Washington Post] * Additional thoughts on what TC Heartland means for venue in patent cases, from IP columnist Gaston Kroub. [On the Docket / George Washington Law Review]

Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 10.06.15

* Review of a new movie where pursuing your innocence is not worth the justice you receive. [Guile is Good] * What is the biggest lie in all of Biglaw? [Daily Lawyer Tips] * Season 3 of I Am The Law launched today! Tune in to get a snippet of what it's really like to be a practicing attorney. [Law School Transparency] * A look back at how lawyer Roberta Kaplan beat the Defense of Marriage Act. [WNYC] * The Winklevoss twins desperately try to come up with the next big thing. [Dealbreaker] * Your counter culture wars are nothing new: remember when Hunter S. Thompson went to Duke? [What About Paris?]

Biglaw

Inside Straight: Don’t Tell Obvious Lies!

Okay, I confess: I made the headline intentionally provocative. You shouldn’t lie at all, and you should absolutely forbid witnesses from lying under oath. (If we, the lawyers, don’t obey the law, who will?) I’m thinking today about a person who is not under oath and will be sorely tempted to tell an obvious lie. […]